Legal Opinion
Patel v. Holley House Motels
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided December 3, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-654-HPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAND, District Judge.
Defendants Holley Midgley, Sue B. Midgley and Holley House Motels (referred to collectively as Midgleys), have made a Motion For Partial Summary Judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the Midgleys are entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the following issues:
1. Plaintiffs have failed to establish a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (Fair Housing Act of 1968), because the Palms Motel is not a “dwelling” as…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Schwarz v. City of Treasure IslandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Keating v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Renda v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1352, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,413 Placido Rivera, Richard Gonzales, Intervenors-Appellants v. The City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Columbus Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.