Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2011No. 06CA1751PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge WEBB.

This direct appeal presents the difficult question of balancing efficient judicial administration against delay when a criminal defendant exercises his Sixth Amendment right to replace appointed counsel with retained counsel and seeks to continue the trial on that basis. Although denying a continuance is within the trial court's discretion, here the court's findings do not show that it adequately considered the right of defendant, Eric Lamont Brown, to counsel of his choosing when it refused to continue the trial to afford his newly-retained counsel time to prepare.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Harry E. Carey v. A. T. Rundle, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  2. People v. RuchColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. HarmonColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API