Legal Opinion
People v. Ruch
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 10CA2436PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE TAUBMAN
1 Defendant, Carl Daniel Ruch, appeals the trial court's judgment revoking his probation for his failure to (1) contact his probation officer at the times and places specified by the officer, (2) receive prior approval from his probation officer before changing his residence, (8) sign releases of information to allow his probation officer to communicate with members of the community supervision *489team, and (4) attend, actively participate in, and successfully complete a sex offender treatment program approved by his proba- . tion officer. We conclude that there was…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. NozolinoColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. RolettoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- v. TimoshchukColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. RuchSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.