Legal Opinion

Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Hinkle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1942No. 14451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This workmen’s compensation case was before us on a former appeal. The opinion appears in Tex.Civ.App., 152 S.W.2d 387, writ refused for want of merit. An examination of our former opinion will disclose that we did not consider the plaintiff’s petition sufficient, in the light of the claim for compensation, and we reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for a new trial.

We endeavored to make it plain to the claimants that we considered it necessary to replead the case in such manner as to clearly set forth the facts on which the claimant, or claimants,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. WarnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Consolidated Underwriters v. FreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Jones v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Hinkle v. Federal Underwriters ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. HinkleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Wigton v. LavenderOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. L. E. Mills v. Texas Compensation Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. TEXAS EMP. INS. ASS'N v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API