Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Warner

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1922No. 347-3724PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCER, P. • J.

Defendants in error, 6. R. Warner and wife, filed a claim with the Industrial Accident Board, as dependents under the Employers’ Liability Act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, arts. 5246 — 1 to 5246 — 91), to recover compensation for the death of their son, Richard Warner. Plaintiff in error was the insurer in the case. Compensation was awarded defendants in error by the Board, and from this decision *665plaintiff in error appealed to the district court. In that court, a judgment, based upon special findings of the jury, was rendered in favor of the defendants in error. Upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosholt v. MehusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. American Employers' Ins. Co. v. SingletonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Deemer Lumber Co. v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. CareyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. HinkleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API