Legal Opinion

Puskarich v. Puskarich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1954No. Appeal, 128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

The claimant applied for compensation for injuries sustained while working for his father, the defendant employer. The other defendant, State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, contended that the employer was not insured because his policy had been canceled prior to the accident. After hearings the referee awarded compensation against the employer only, finding as a fact that there was no insurance coverage at the time of the accident. The Board affirmed the referee, but the court below sustained exceptions to the Board’s decision, overruled that decision, and remanded the record…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Gill v. FIVESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Shemanchick v. M. & S. Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rice v. A. Steiert & Sons, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Nash v. Sandnes' Sons, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Stump v. Follmer Trucking Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Kracoski v. Bernice White Ash Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API