Legal Opinion

Portman v. Administrator, 15-07-12 (7-14-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2008No. 15-07-12PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The plaintiff-appellant, George Portman, appeals the judgment of the Van Wert County Common Pleas Court denying his motion for summary judgment and granting the motion for dismissal filed by the defendant-appellee, Specialized Express L.L.C. On appeal, Portman argues that the trial court improperly denied his motion for summary judgment because it had previously deemed jurisdiction admitted by the defendant; that the trial court improperly denied his motion for summary judgment because jurisdiction is a question of law for the court; and that the trial court improperly granted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. StottsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. SparksOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API