CMSH Co., Inc. v. Antelope Development, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
Introduction
In this case we are asked to determine whether inflation, as indicated in the consumer price index, should be considered in fixing damages for the nonexpungement of a lis pendens where the fair market value of the real property has actually appreciated during the lis pendens period. We hold that it should not and affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
On August 10, 1979, respondents CMSH Company, Inc., and Mohammad Mohanna (hereafter, CMSH) filed a complaint for specific performance and for damages for breach of contract and refusal to bargain in good…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haisfield v. ACP Florida Holdings, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Reese v. Hung Kim WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re RoffleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1998