Viguers v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 We decide, inter alia, whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and dismissing this products liability and negligence action against the defendant cigarette manufacturer. We affirm.
¶ 2 Plaintiff-appellant Ralph Viguers and his wife, the decedent Aurelia Viguers, filed this action against defendant-appellee Philip Morris, Incorporated (PMI). The complaint included claims of strict liability, negligence and conspiracy based on the alleged defectiveness of PMI’s product, Parliament cigarettes, which Aurelia Vi-guers smoked from 1957 until 1985 or 1987.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Coffman v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Goldstein v. Phillip Morris, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Barton v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Lance v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Sykes v. Glaxo-SmithKlineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Salvio v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.