Legal Opinion

Roth v. Carvel Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 5, 1995No. 95 Civ. 5029(LAK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

The parties to this attorney’s fee dispute agreed, after the commencement of this action, to resolve the controversy by binding arbitration. They agreed to procedural ground rules and to the method for selection of the arbitrator. On their consent, the Court ordered this action discontinued “upon the appointment of the arbitrator.” The parties thereupon ignored the stipulated method for selection of an arbitrator and now disagree as to whether an arbitrator has been duly appointed and, if so, whether he should be disqualified for bias. The matter comes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel, Government of Israel, Third-Party v. American Arbitration Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Marc Rich & Co. v. Transmarine Seaways Corp. of MonroviaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Globe Transport & Trading Ltd. v. Guthrie Latex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greater Miami Baseball Club Ltd. Partnership v. SeligDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API