Legal Opinion
Craig v. American District Telegraph Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James H. Boomer, J.
The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. "[I]t is clear that, under the Civil Practice Laws and Rules, the statements in pleadings are still required to be factual, that is, the essential facts required to give 'notice’ must be stated.” (Foley v D’Agostino, 21 AD2d 60, 63.) "[Notice of the transactions and occurrences constituting the cause of action is required, and a pleading consisting solely of conclusory allegations will be no more acceptable under the present practice than it was formerly.” (3 Weinstein-KornMiller, NY Civ…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Hoisting Engine Sales Co. v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Aegis Productions, Inc. v. Arriflex Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Rinaldi & Sons, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- D.L. Lee & Sons, Inc. v. ADT Security Systems, Mid-South, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Falker v. Chrysler Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Craig v. American District Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.