Legal Opinion
Sickinger v. Zimel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 21, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
8 N.J. Super. 455 (1950)
73 A.2d 281
FRANK SICKINGER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF NATHAN TIGER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HEYMAN ZIMEL AND HARRY GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided April 21, 1950.
Mr. Samuel Black, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, John W. Griggs, II, appearing, attorneys for defendants.
GRIMSHAW, J.S.C.
The trustee in bankruptcy of Nathan Tiger sues to set aside a chattel mortgage given by Tiger and his wife to the defendants. The mortgage is challenged upon the ground that the affidavit of consideration is false in fact and that,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deyoe v. Harper Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Arnesto Paint Co. v. BrushNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Bigel v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Bigel v. Brandtjen Kluge, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Kauffman v. Utility Trucking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re LeppertDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- In Re LeppertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953