Legal Opinion

Bigel v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 29, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

We concur in the view of the learned Vice-Chancellor that the chattel mortgage is void as to creditors for failure to set out in the affidavit annexed thereto a true and full statement of the consideration thereof as required by B. S. 1987, J¡ 6:28-5. There was a lack of substantial compliance with this provision of the statute. Honesty is not alone the determinative; completeness of statement is also a prerequisite.

We are also of opinion that the Vice-Chancellor correctly charged appellant with the receiver’s compensation and administration expenses; but we think the counsel fee…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jarecki v. Manville Bakery, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Bruck v. the Credit CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. Emmerglick v. Philip Wolf, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Osco Motors Corp. v. MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  5. Sickinger v. ZimelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API