Bigel v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
We concur in the view of the learned Vice-Chancellor that the chattel mortgage is void as to creditors for failure to set out in the affidavit annexed thereto a true and full statement of the consideration thereof as required by B. S. 1987, J¡ 6:28-5. There was a lack of substantial compliance with this provision of the statute. Honesty is not alone the determinative; completeness of statement is also a prerequisite.
We are also of opinion that the Vice-Chancellor correctly charged appellant with the receiver’s compensation and administration expenses; but we think the counsel fee…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Jarecki v. Manville Bakery, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Bruck v. the Credit CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Emmerglick v. Philip Wolf, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Osco Motors Corp. v. MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Sickinger v. ZimelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.