Arnesto Paint Co. v. Brush
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Two years ago the defendant Brush gave to Harold M. Blanchard as trustee, a mortgage on chattels in a store at Bogota. There was no actual change of possession of the things mortgaged and hence, under the Chattel Mortgage act (Comp. Stat. p. 463), the mortgage was void as against Brush's creditors, unless the mortgage with the affidavit required by the statute was immediately recorded. The mortgage was indeed recorded with an affidavit by the mortgagee stating that the consideration was certain promissory notes aggregating $3,600, but such a statement of the consideration is insufficient,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham Button Co. v. SpielmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
- Wisner Mfg. Co. v. Second National, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Lion Shoe Co. v. PriceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Jaburg v. KirschenbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. Staten Island Clay Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atzingen v. OttolinoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
- Bigel v. Brandtjen Kluge, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- In re A. J. Doan & Son, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Timmer v. TalbotDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1936
- Abrams v. BrownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.