Legal Opinion
Eugene Eisler and Elizabeth Eisler v. Nathan Stritzler
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 25, 1976No. 75-1331PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents several questions concerning federal practice and procedure. Plaintiffs, Eugene and Elizabeth Eisler, instituted this action, relying for jurisdiction solely upon diversity of citizenship, to recover damages they allegedly suffered in various business and securities transactions with defendant, Nathan Stritzler. Defendant admitted diversity of citizenship in his pleadings, but subsequently was defaulted for failing to obey the district court’s order that he give a deposition. After the district court announced its intention to enter the default…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Dundee Cement Company v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Ca 79-3781 United Artists Corporation and Walt Disney Productions v. Harold FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Tuck v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Wolfgang Von Dunser v. Arnold Y. AronoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Kathleen McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.