Legal Opinion

Leroy Vernon Drennon, Jr. v. Norman B. Hess and the Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, Respondents

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1981No. 80-1063PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of attempting to obtain controlled drugs by forged prescription, after former conviction of two felonies, in violation of Okla.Stat. Ann. tit. 63, § 2-407 (1971); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 21 § 51(B) (Supp.1976). Section 51(B), a recidivist provision, required…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Mabry v. KlimasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Thigpen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Drennon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coleman v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Kenneth Wayne Dupuy v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Coleman v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Swart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Jackie Ray Shaw v. Jerry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API