Leroy Vernon Drennon, Jr. v. Norman B. Hess and the Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, Respondents
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of attempting to obtain controlled drugs by forged prescription, after former conviction of two felonies, in violation of Okla.Stat. Ann. tit. 63, § 2-407 (1971); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 21 § 51(B) (Supp.1976). Section 51(B), a recidivist provision, required…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mabry v. KlimasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Thigpen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Drennon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coleman v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Kenneth Wayne Dupuy v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Coleman v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Swart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Jackie Ray Shaw v. Jerry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.