Legal Opinion
Swart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 17, 1986No. C-84-584PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKS, Presiding Judge:
With this case, we are called upon to assess the constitutionality of the Oklahoma Intermediate Offender Act, currently codified at 22 O.S.Supp.1984, § 995 et seq. After oral argument, and upon consideration of the excellent briefs filed by appellant, the State of Oklahoma, and various amicus curiae, we determine the Act is unconstitutional.
On January 12, 1984, and January 17, 1984, the appellant, Thomas Deshawn Swart, was charged in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-84-114 and CRF-84-178, with the crimes of Attempted Burglary and Knowingly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- TRYON v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- State v. PrattCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- State v. HunterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.