Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Kenneth Bankston, No. 71-1655 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1971No. 864Published

1Opinion of the Court

446 F.2d 864

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Albert Kenneth BANKSTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-1655 Summary Calendar.*

*(1) Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.

v.

Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431

F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 16, 1971.

Albert K. Bankston, pro se.

E. Donald Strange, Daniel E. Lynn, Asst. U.S. Attys., Robert E. Hauberg, U.S. Atty., S.D. Miss., Joseph E. Brown, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

2Per curiam

1

This appeal is taken…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Albert Kenneth BankstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Jose M. Rodriguez, A/K/A Tony, No. 30200 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Albert Kenneth BankstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API