Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert Kenneth Bankston
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1970No. 27861PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the ease on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
Albert Kenneth Bankston, appellant, was convicted in the district court for violation of Sections 2113(a) and (d), Title 18, U.S.C. The jury found appellant guilty of armed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Gregory James Freeman and David Lyle Boese, A/K/A Dennis Phillip Stevens and David SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Brian A. Anderson, Richard Quentin Felts, and Paul William Spicer,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States of America Ex Rel. Alfred Stahl v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- William Leroy Wright v. The State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.