Flanagan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for burglary. Trial was before the court and punishment was assessed at five years probated.
In his second ground of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. The State relied upon circumstantial evidence.
The indictment alleges in pertinent part that on October 31, 1977, appellant did:
“Knowingly and intentionally enter a habitation without the effective consent of Cecil Chatman, the owner thereof, and with the intent to commit theft.. . ”
Curtis Wilson testified that his home in Dallas is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Parr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ex Parte ShieldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Schershel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Dingler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wilford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Gayton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.