Dingler v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TEAGUE, Judge.
In an unpublished opinion, the Austin Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Kenneth Dingier, appellant. See Dingler v. State (Tex.App. Austin No. 3-82-066-Cr, 9-21-83). It rejected his contention that because there was a variance between what was alleged in the indictment and the proof that was adduced this rendered the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction. We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to make the determination whether the court of appeals correctly resolved the issue against…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Compton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Eaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Williams v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Cockrell v. EstevezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.