Legal Opinion

Gayton v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 28, 1987No. 13-86-214-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to fourteen years in the Texas Department of Corrections.

In his first point of error, appellant complains that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction because of a variance between the victim’s name as alleged in the indictment and the name as proved at trial. The indictment alleged the victim’s name as Porfino Garcia but the proof showed his name to be Porfirio Garcia.

The name of the complaining witness must be alleged and proven. A material variance between the allegation and proof will render…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Escobar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  3. McFarland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  4. Abu-Shabaam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API