Pruitt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Judge.
The indictment was for swindling. The offense as alleged was based upon the fact that appellant defrauded the First Hational Bank of Hawkins, a corporation, by obtaining from it a sum of money on a check drawn by him on the Continental State Bank of Sandy, Texas.
It was charged that he represented that he had the right and authority to draw the check, that it would be a good and valid check and would be paid by the Continental State Bank when presented in the ordinary course of business.
This happened about April 15, 1915; the indictment was returned December 7, 1916. Appellant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- State v. BaggerlyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Spurlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
3Cited by11 opinions
- B. A. Williams, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Fortune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.