State v. Baggerly
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Smith. Tried below before Hon. Indictment for swindling. Motion to quash sustained.
1Opinion of the CourtRobebts, J.
This is an indictment under the 15th Section of the Act of 1854, defining swindling, which reads as follows, (leaving out the part not pertinent to this case,) to-wit: “ If any person shall designedly, by any false pretence and with intent to defraud, obtain the signature of any person to a written instrument, the false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, he shall be punished by confinement to hard labor in the penitentiary,” &c. (Laws 1854-3, p. 61.)
To appreciate the meaning of this Statute, we must consider its object. If a note, purporting to have been given by some person, be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BadgleyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Commonwealth v. HoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Moody v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.