Lato v. Attorney General of United States
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUNTON, Chief Judge.
BEFORE THIS COURT is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs did not file a response to Defendants’ Motion. After careful consideration of the arguments contained in the Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of their Motion, the Court is of the opinion Plaintiffs have failed to state a genuine dispute as to material facts, thus Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be GRANTED.
On February 29,1991, this Court granted the application of Plaintiff Solomon Lato to proceed In Forma Pauperis in the above-captioned…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Archer v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1995
- Washington v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020