Legal Opinion

Washington Manufacturing Co. v. Wickersham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1947No. 15608PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In a suit by a purchaser for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, it should be made to appear that before institution of the action the plaintiff had paid or tendered the purchase-money according to the contract, or that tender had been waived by the defendant. Robert v. Mayer, 191 Ga. 588 (1) (13 S. E. 2d, 382).

“He who would have equity must do equity, and give effect to ¿11 equitable rights of the other party respecting the subject-matter of the suit.” Code, § 37-104. “One seeking relief from excessive tax levies,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Wallace & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Clisby v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Roberts v. MayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Clayton v. NewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Martin v. Oakhurst Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawton v. ByckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Kaplan v. KrantzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Blake v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Callaway v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API