Martin v. Oakhurst Development Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The description of the lot as contained in the lease and option contract, giving the State, county, and district, and describing the lot as containing a half acre, 94 by 117 feet, as being on the north side of Shepherd Ford public road, and as being bounded on all other sides by .lands of another person, where no starting point was designated, standing alone, was too indefinite to authorize a recovery of the land, or a decree for specific performance. Clark v. Knowles, 129 Ga. 291 (58 S. E. 841); Hunter v. Bowen, 137 Ga. 258 (73 S. E.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- East Atlanta Land Co. v. MowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Redmond v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. DeLoacheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- Madison, Ltd. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Bennett v. RewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Malone v. KlaerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.