Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1901No. Crim. No. 764PublishedCited by 11 opinions

HABEAS CORPUS in the Supreme Court to test the validity of an ordinance of Ventura County passed by vote of the electors of the county. conviction of the petitioner was had in the justice’s court of Saticoy township, before W. D. Wright, justice of the peace, for alleged violation of an ordinance entitled “An ordinance prohibiting the business of selling and the sale of vinous, spirituous, distilled, malt, mixed, and other intoxicating liquors within the county of Ventura,”…

Read the full summary

HABEAS CORPUS in the Supreme Court to test the validity of an ordinance of Ventura County passed by vote of the electors of the county. conviction of the petitioner was had in the justice’s court of Saticoy township, before W. D. Wright, justice of the peace, for alleged violation of an ordinance entitled “An ordinance prohibiting the business of selling and the sale of vinous, spirituous, distilled, malt, mixed, and other intoxicating liquors within the county of Ventura,” etc., purporting to be an ordinance of said county, “ under and in accordance with the provisions of section 13” of the…

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Petitioner was convicted of violating an ordinance of the county of Ventura, adopted by a vote of the electors of the county at an election held in November, 1900, under the provisions of section 13 of the County Government Act of 1897 (Stats. 1897, p. 454). He contends that the ordinance under which his conviction was had is unconstitutional and void.

Section 1 of- article XI of the constitution reads as follows: “ The several counties, as they now exist, are hereby recognized as legal subdivisions of this state.”

Section 4 of article XI of the constitution provides that “ the legislature…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. In Re QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Cline v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Ex Parte YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API