Legal Opinion
Huskey Manufacturing Co. v. Friel-McLeister Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 10, 1924No. Appeal, 278PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The plaintiff’s action is founded on a claim for work and materials furnished to the defendant which was not disputed by the latter. The controversy arises out of a counterclaim set forth on the record by means of which the defendant sought to recover damages for a breach of contract by the plaintiff through which a loss resulted to the defendant in excess of the plaintiff’s demand. This counterclaim arose out of a contract in writing entered into May 15, 1923, between the plaintiff and defendant according to the terms of which the former agreed to furnish to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hamilton v. . McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Comey v. . United Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Lillard v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Magar v. Lifetime, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. Bryant Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Samuels v. Illinois Fire Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- John Conti Co., Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Myer Feinstein Co. v. De VincentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.