Legal Opinion

Great American Indemnity Co. v. Oxford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1943No. 29861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

“1. The rule announced in the Penal Code, § .985 [§ 38-111], declaring the distinction ordinarily existing be ’tween the weight to be given to positive testimony and that to be .given to negative testimony, while ofttimes useful to the jury as tending to facilitate the reconciliation of apparent conflicts in the evidence, is so inaptly stated in the Code section referred to that to instruct the jury in the language there given is ordinarily error. Warrick v. State, 125 Ga. 133, 142 [53 S. E. 1027]; Minor v. State, 120 Ga. 490 [48 S. E. 198]; Cowart v. State, 120 Ga. 510 [48 S. E. 198]; So.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Warrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Killian v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Hare v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. TwedellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Ridley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API