Legal Opinion

Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1948No. 31883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

A petition is subject to general demurrer if all the essential elements of the cause of action are not alleged, for if one is lacking the petition is not sufficient. In other words, to withstand a general demurrer all such essential elements must be alleged by setting forth evidentiary or preliminary facts which would demand, as a matter of law, a conclusion that a cause of action existed. See Bivins v. Tucker, 41 Ga. App. 771, 774 (154 S. E. 820).

While a petition is sufficient to withstand a general demurrer if all the essential elements constituting the gist of the cause of action are…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Merchants National Bank v. GuilmartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Bivins v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Renfroe v. FouchéCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Thompson v. Mobile Light & R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Park 'N Go of Georgia, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Holmes v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Loeb v. WhittonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Davidson v. RamsbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Cordell Ford Co. v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API