Legal Opinion

Craswell v. Biggs

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1938PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

This is an action upon a bond given to secure the faithful performance of a contract for work on a portion of a road and for the prompt payment of all laborers, mechanics and subcontractors and materialmen. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. Findings of fact were made and a judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendants Biggs and Hallyburton and in favor of the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, a corporation, from which judgment the plaintiffs appeal.

The facts in regard to the case are about as follows: On May 12, 1931, plaintiffs L.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Nugent v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Fitzgerald v. NealOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Marks v. Twohy Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. v. DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API