Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Morton Hotel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 31, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 3523PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, District Judge,
The eourt in this case called a pretrial conference immediately before the trial opened on October 1, 1962. The purpose of the pre-trial was to discuss the issues involved in the case and to attempt to expedite the disposition of the action under Rule 16, subd. 6, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
The court was moved to do so after a careful study of the pleadings, depositions and exhibits of the parties led the court to conclude that there was no true question of fact. As a result of this discussion, the court suggested that arguments be made in the form of a motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Honig v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Mullaly v. Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Davis v. CohenMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Maine Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edward D. Oppenheimer, Robert A. Burger, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Morton Hotel Corporation, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Kalpakian v. Oklahoma Sheraton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Link-Simon, Inc. v. Muehlebach Hotel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
- Goncalves v. Regent International Hotels, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Goncalves v. Regent International Hotels, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.