Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cohen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 94, Calendar No. 35,300PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiffs Davis were guests in defendant’s hotel. They left a diamond and some money in the hotel safe, which were not returned. Having heard a rumor that a robbery of the safe was being asserted by defendant, Mr. Davis asked defendant wbat he was going to do about, it. Defendant replied that the safe had been robbed, and the matter was for the insurance company.

Nearly a year later plaintiffs began this suit ask-' ing judgment for value of the property. Mr. Davis was dropped as a party. Mrs. Davis had verdict and judgment for $250 (maximum amount under statute, 2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 6929' [2…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stoll v. Almon C. Judd Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Baehr v. DowneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Thomas Canning Co. v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Huckins Hotel Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Purity Ice Cream & Dairy Co. v. Adams Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SerrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Goodwin v. Georgian Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Oppenheimer v. Morton Hotel Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1962
  4. Layton v. Seward CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Eric Leiendecker v. Ascension Genesys HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API