Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goncalves v. Regent International Hotels, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1983Published

1DissentJasen, J.

The majority today holds that a jury and not a court must decide what constitutes a “safé” within the meaning of section 200 of the General Business Law. Since I believe that it is a well-established principle of law, based upon sound policy considerations, that it is for the court, rather than a jury, to construe the meaning of words contained in a statute, I am compelled to dissent from the majority holding.

What is involved here is simply a question of pure statutory construction. The issue presented is whether or not a bank of individually locked metal safe-deposit boxes enclosed in a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Pell v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API