Goncalves v. Regent International Hotels, Ltd.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentJasen, J.
The majority today holds that a jury and not a court must decide what constitutes a “safé” within the meaning of section 200 of the General Business Law. Since I believe that it is a well-established principle of law, based upon sound policy considerations, that it is for the court, rather than a jury, to construe the meaning of words contained in a statute, I am compelled to dissent from the majority holding.
What is involved here is simply a question of pure statutory construction. The issue presented is whether or not a bank of individually locked metal safe-deposit boxes enclosed in a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pell v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.