Pollasky v. Minchener
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Case. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
The plaintiffs sued Minchener and Eobert G. Dun to recover damages for a libel published by the E. G. Dun & Co. Mercantile Agency, of which Minchener was the general manager of a district in Michigan, of and concerning the plaintiffs.
Max E. Pollasky and Prank E. Pollasky comjmsed the firm of Pollasky Bros., carrying on mercantile business at the village of Alma, Gratiot county, Mich. They had been engaged in business at that place since 1882. They were in good credit, and had never filed or placed a chattel mortgage upon their property, and in carrying on their business bought mostly upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bacon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Bradstreet Co. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Taylor v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shore v. Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- International Union United Automobile Workers v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Brewer v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Harrison v. Arrow Metal Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Richardson v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.