Legal Opinion

People v. Aho

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1985No. F003260PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, J.

Statement of the Case

Defendant appeals from his convictions of possession of methamphetamine for sale and possession of marijuana for sale, violations of Health and Safety Code sections 11378 and 11359. Defendant was sentenced to the middle term of two years for each conviction to be served concurrently. Defendant attacks his conviction and sentence on four points: (1) No prob able cause justified the search of his residence; (2) the trial court erroneously denied defendant probation; (3) the trial court erroneously imposed the middle term sentence; and (4) defendant’s attorney…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. CampaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. SandlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. People v. GlenosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. TuadlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API