Legal Opinion
People v. Sandlin
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1991No. G009302PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
Kent Sandlin and Barbara Tustison pleaded no contest to several charges of cultivation and possession of marijuana for sale following the denial of their motions to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) Sandlin contends there was no probable cause for issuance of the search warrant. Both contend the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to hold a Franks v. Delaware (1978) 438 U.S. 154 [57 L.Ed.2d 667, 98 S.Ct. 2674] evidentiary hearing on the veracity of the affidavit in support of the search warrant. We affirm.
I
The facts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Candelario Angulo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Wimberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. EidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. BoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.