People v. Tuadles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1780Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
Convicted by jury of possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359), appellant Jude Jusus Mercado challenges the sufficiency of a search warrant affidavit and appellant Wilfredo Batoon Tuadles claims the trial court should have instructed, sua sponte, on “innocent possession.” We find no error and affirm.
Procedural and Factual Background
In December 1988 a narcotics officer obtained a search warrant for three residences: Tuadles’s apartment, a vacant apartment in the same building beneath Tuadles’s apartment, and appellant Mercado’s residence. Pursuant to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. DeutschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Fenwick & West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. Brown CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.