Legal Opinion
Allergia, Inc. v. Bouboulis
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 19, 2017No. Case No.: 14-CV-1566 JLS (RBB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF LEGAL EXPENSES
(ECF No. 59)
Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendant Denis Bouboulis’ Motion for Advancement of Legal Expenses. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 59.) Also before the Court is Plaintiff Allergia, Inc.’s Response in Opposition to, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 62), and Defendant’s Reply in Support of, (“Reply,” ECF No. 64), Defendant’s Motion. Plaintiff also filed an untimely supplemental response in opposition. (“Supp. Opp’n,” ECF No. 63.) The Court vacated the hearing on the Motion scheduled for August…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. CouturierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Kaung v. Cole National Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Bernstein v. TractManager, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Ficus Investments, Inc. v. Private Capital Management, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David Goldman v. LBG Real Estate Companies, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
- Richmond v. Mikkelson CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021