Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank C. Parrino, United States of America v. Matthew Trupiano
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1987No. 86-1488, 86-1687PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Frank C. Parrino and Matthew Trupiano appeal from a judgment entered by the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 1 A jury convicted Parrino and Trupiano of violating various gambling and tax laws, 636 F.Supp. 1071 (1986). For reversal, appellants argue that the district court committed error (1) in its jury instruction defining gambling business members as used in 18 U.S.C. § 1955, (2) by ruling that electronic surveillance orders and search warrants were properly issued, (3) in its instruction to the jury identifying the acts necessary for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Kenneth Huie DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Steve Thomas, United States of America v. Frank Schullo and Anthony PetrangeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Lawrence McHaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Frank Dennis FelixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Charles ShurnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. TranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Anthony TempleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ernesto Gutierrez-SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.