Legal Opinion

Di Biase v. Garnsey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 11, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This action was originally commenced as an action of replevin in which the defendant filed a counterclaim and has twice before been before this court; 103 Conn. 21, 130 Atl. 81; 104 Conn. 447, 113 Atl. 669; in each of which instances a new trial upon the counterclaim was ordered. On the trial to which this appeal relates, the parties were at issue only upon defendant’s counterclaim in which he sought to recover the reasonable value of labor performed, material and new parts furnished, in repairing plaintiff’s motortruck.

The reasons of appeal relating to failure of the court to charge the jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Petterson v. WeinstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Barber's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Worden v. Gore-Meenan Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Dibiase v. GarnseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Slade v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Bagre v. Daggett Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Trasacco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API