Legal Opinion
Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 18, 2004No. 03-475PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 540 U. S. 1088.] Motion to recuse, referred to Justice Scalia [540 U. S. 1217], and by him denied.
Memorandum of
Justice Scalia.
I have before me a motion to recuse in these cases consolidated below. The motion is filed on behalf of respondent Sierra Club. The other private respondent, Judicial Watch, Inc., does not join the motion and has publicly stated that it “does not believe the presently-known facts about the hunting trip satisfy the legal standards requiring recusal.” Judicial Watch Statement 2 (Feb. 13, 2004) (available in Clerk of Court’s case…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Ginsburg v. Evergreen Security, Ltd. (In Re Evergreen Security, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Elaine Marshall v. J. Marshall, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Mandawala v. NE Baptist HospCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.