Legal Opinion
Rubin v. Dondysh
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 25, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
Motion by plaintiff to reargue and/or renew the order of this court dated December 19, 1989 (Rubin v Dondysh, 146 Misc 2d 37), which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is denied on both procedural and substantive grounds.
Procedurally, plaintiff has failed to adhere to approved and proper practice upon a motion to reargue or renew, which requires the submission to the Judge who decided the original motion of an affidavit setting forth the decision and the ground for reargument, together with a request for an order to show cause (People v…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Simpson v. LoehmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.