Commonwealth v. Karkaria
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
Appellant asserts that the evidence adduced at his trial was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain his conviction of forcible rape. Our review of the record compels the conclusion that appellant is correct and that his conviction must be reversed.
Appellant, Ian Karkaria, was charged with forcible rape, at 18 Pa.C.S. § 3121(1), pursuant to a private criminal complaint. The complaint alleged that appellant committed the crime of rape upon his stepsister on various dates between April 9, 1984 and September 19,1984. 1 The Allegheny County District Attorney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DevlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. PaolelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.