Legal Opinion

MacK v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 29, 2009No. Civil Action RDB-08-688PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs James and Sylvia Mack, on behalf of their daughter Crystal Mack, have brought the instant products liability suit against Defendants AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Centocor, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs claim that Crystal Mack died after suffering from a cardiac arrhythmia that was caused by her use of Remicade, a medication that is manufactured by Centocor, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, and distributed by AmerisourceBergen.

On May 27, 2009, Defendants filed a Motion for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Carol Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McClellan v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  2. Young v. SwineyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. In Re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Contacts Lens Solution Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Jason Alford, et al. v. The NFL Player Disability & Survivor Benefit Plan, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API