Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Perre

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Rothwax, J.

The defendant has been indicted for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees and moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a). The defendant contends that he was arraigned on the indictment more than six months after the commencement of the criminal action and that the People’s prearraignment statement of readiness was not valid. The People oppose, conceding that they must be charged with the 182 days between the filing of the felony complaint and the filing of the indictment and the certificate of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. GossNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. SanchezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CenatCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  2. People v. RichardCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
  3. People v. SheehanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API