Legal Opinion

People v. Cenat

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 1, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas Farber, J.

Defendant moves to reargue an oral decision of this court denying a motion to dismiss for facial insufficiency and a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30. The motion to reargue is granted and, upon reargument, I adhere to my original decision.

*40Defendant is charged with two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). The People allege that defendant left her two children, ages 10 and 3 years, unsupervised in a car on a Brooklyn street for a period in excess of two hours.

Background

Defendant was initially charged by misdemeanor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. DoeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  4. People v. SewardMount Vernon City Court · 1997
  5. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
  2. MENDOZA OSORIOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
  3. Guzman v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. People v. MercadoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
  5. People v. AfiaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API