Legal Opinion
Nicolls v. Wetmore
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 12, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — W. G. Sears, Judge. The opinion states the casé.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
On or about November 18, 1911, plaintiff and defendants had certain negotiations concerning the sale of Hudson automobiles, for which the defendants held an agency. The details of the oral negotiations are the subject of dispute, but it is agreed that, on the date named, they executed a certain written or printed ■ instrument. Whether this instrument constituted a complete contract by which alone the rights of the parties herein are to be determined *133is also a subject of controversy. In this instrument, the defendants are mentioned as “the Dealer”, and plaintiff as “the Subdealer”. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Velie Motor Car Co. v. Kopmeier Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Goodyear v. H. J. Koehler Sporting Goods Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Hessenius v. WetmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gurfein v. WerbelovskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Des Moines Marble & Mantel Co. v. SeeversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Eagle Coal & Mining Co. v. HazenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Price v. HornburgWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- May v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940