Legal Opinion
Price v. Hornburg
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1918No. 14470PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, G-irand, J., entered December 20,1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover a deposit made under a sales contract, tried to -the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
On June 14, 1913, appellant, called the •“company,” and respondent, called the “dealer,” entered into a written contract, the provisions thereof pertinent to the present inquiry being as follows:
‘ ‘ The dealer shall have the right to sell, and the company will sell to him, the following styles and types of :motor cars, namely, Maxwells, from the following ter*473ritory: Lewis county,, and north half of Idaho county, state of Idaho; quantity 10, model Maxwells, discount 15%.'
“If any contract to take and pay for cars is unfulfilled by the dealer, the company may retain the amount of any deposit…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nicolls v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goebel v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946